Category Archives: Environment

Getting the Avenue ship-shape

It is a source of great pride for Guildford to host the University of Surrey and the many students from all over the country and beyond who come here to study. They add so much vitality to the town and we all gain from having them here.

One group that gains more than most is the town’s landlords. They can charge rents on short-term leases to large numbers of students. This is perfectly legitimate, of course, and benefits students and landlords alike. Or, at least, it should.

I remember being a student, then a young graduate engineer, in private rented sector accommodation where I rented a flat with others in my position. Studying or working long hours in communal accommodation means everyone has to muck in to keep it ship-shape.

Rubbish in GPA today

Rubbish in GPA today

It is really important that we provide a comfortable clean living environment for our students and young residents. That is why I spent today in Guildford Park Avenue. I was investigating the reports I had received about rubbish being uncollected and the street scene deteriorating.

This street has a high proportion of buy-to-let student properties. I would like to turn this situation around and help Guildford Park Avenue become a model of town and gown living.

A PC World shopping trolley in GPA. They will soon have it back, one way or another!

A PC World shopping trolley in GPA. They will soon have it back, one way or another!

The first thing we have to do is clean up the rubbish and get it ship-shape and Guildford fashion.

  • The shopping trolleys won’t do – so I’ve contacted PC World and M&S to get them to collect theirs.
  • The cable TV/phone cabinets hanging open won’t do either so I’ve filed a complaint with Virgin Media to get them replaced and cleaned up. I used to work for this company as an engineer so I
    Dear Virgin Media, if you don't fix this you'll be hearing from me and my shipmates.

    Dear Virgin Media, if you don’t fix this you’ll be hearing from me and my shipmates.

    know these things are possible but only if residents complain loudly and repeatedly and I can do that quite well!

  • The piles of rubbish, mattresses, broken furniture and estate agents signs lying in bushes won’t do, of course. I have written to the council, as well asfillingintheirfly-tipping report, andIhaveemailedFoxtons estate agent with a photo of their discarded sign.

    Foxton's estate agent's sign lying in the bushes. I'm happy to carry it into their office if required.

    Foxton’s estate agent’s sign lying in the bushes. I’m happy to carry it into their office if required.

To get Guildford Park Avenue ship-shape will need a good crew. Would you like to help? I expect the University and the council will get on board once they see what needs done. If the companies I have mentioned don’t sort out their flotsam and jetsam then we will take their trolleys and signs and anything else round to their offices and hoist it all aboard for them in person.

The current state of GPA reminds me of my own student days. Now that I’m a Captain I want to show that it needn’t be like this. Let’s get this street ship-shape for everyone. Let’s live together as one ship’s company. Let’s have a community.


Here are some of the responses received so far:

PCW2543729CR, RE_ Your trolley in Guildford street

Guildford Borough Council Health & Community Care Services auto-reply

FW_ Foxtons

Foxtons 2


We are starting to make some progress. These emails explain:

M&S Shopping Trolley

Rubbish outside 184 Guildford park Avenue [UNC]


I did a quick inspection yesterday and the rubbish pile I complained about has gone. Foxtons have collected their sign, M&S have removed their trolley and the fly-tipped furniture I reported has been removed.

This is good progress but the Virgin Media cabinets are still burst open with wires spewing forth and the PC World trolley is still there although they emailed yesterday to say it will be collected soon.


The PC World trolley is gone now. I reported the discarded mattress and broken furniture dumped beside it to the council and they came and removed it all.

Virgin Media have replied to my third complaint promising to sort out their broken street cabinets asap.

Tory Runnymede Council Blunders Criticised by Inspector

Regular readers will be well informed about the saga of the Green Belt “DERA” site at Chobham Common. I have been campaigning for years to protect the endangered species of birds found in the unique heathland habitat of Chobham Common. Tory Runnymede Borough Council (RBC) want to change Green Belt boundaries to allow a huge development right at the edge of their borough. They have ignored the severe damage that this would cause to wildlife and the openness of the countryside.

RBC intended to remove the entire DERA site from Green Belt protections as part of their Local Plan Core Strategy. Now the Planning Inspectorate has slammed them for failing to listen to neighbouring authorities and recommended that they withdraw their plan. The Tory council is determined to trash this area of Surrey countryside, so it remains to be seen if they will withdraw the plan and if they do, whether they will immediately try again.

New housing is needed in Surrey but there are plenty of suitable sites elsewhere in the borough which are not in the Green Belt. Tory RBC should admit defeat and look for sustainable sites to build homes which will not destroy an invaluable habitat for rare wildlife.

Guildford Tories Run Out of Excuses

As regular readers will be aware, Conservative Guildford Borough Council is rushing to war on the Green Belt. Their acceptance of developers’ wishes to build on pristine greenfield sites instead of previously developed brownfield ones has met with huge public opposition. There have been well-supported petitions and marches, and not just from people who normally oppose Conservative policies either.

Hapless, two-time drink-driver Cllr Stephen Mansbridge, who is still Leader of Guildford BC, has blamed central government and the Planning Inspectorate. He claimed that if GBC submitted a Local Plan which did not meet independently assessed housing needs then the Inspectorate would force a change in Green Belt boundaries. He tried to persuade people to accept a reduction in the Green Belt of their choosing rather than have one forced on us, which he said was inevitable.

It turns out he was wrong, either deliberately or inadvertently. The Planning Minister, Nick Boles, sent a letter to the Planning Inspectorate last week (and made a written submission to Parliament) on this subject which couldn’t clearer: Nick Boles letter

He says that the Secretary of State, Eric Pickles, will prevent the Planning Inspectorate overruling local authorities if they decide not to change Green Belt boundaries, even if it means they miss their housing targets. A link to the statement is here. The second bullet point claims that Boles is:

re-affirming green Belt protection, noting that unmet housing need is unlikely to outweigh harm to the green Belt and other harm to constitute very special circumstances justifying inappropriate development

This puts Cllr Mansbridge and Tory Guildford Borough Council in a rather tricky spot. I was interviewed on BBC Surrey radio last Thursday about this.

I think it is time for Cllr Mansbridge to listen to the public and scrap plans to change Green Belt boundaries within Guildford Borough. He has claimed that the council cannot live within its budget and needs the New Homes Bonus that building on the Green Belt would bring. He has also raised Council Tax this year by the maximum allowed. However, the cut to GBC’s non-ringfenced central government funding has only been 2.1% since 2010, much less than the 34%+ suffered by some less fortunate authorities.

Under Mansbridge, GBC seem unable to make efficiencies or even meet basic expectations of residents. He recently wrote a very long letter to the Surrey Advertiser grumbling and moaning about how it wasn’t his fault that Council Tax was rising, the traffic in Guildford is impossible, the Green Belt was about to be lost and there was no hope of building the new homes we need.

Guildford needs new leadership. We need to get a grip. Protect our Green Belt. Force developers to use the planning permissions they already hold. Sort out the abysmal traffic and transport problems. And stop demanding ever higher Council Tax from even the poorest families in the borough.

Cllr Mansbridge has had two warnings already. He told the Prime Minister that he expects to lose control of the council along with the parliamentary seat in 2015. People in Guildford can’t wait that long. Mansbridge should go now before extending his record of failure. He has run out of excuses.

Guildford Council’s Rush to War on the Green Belt

Conservative Guildford Borough Council has managed to achieve an astonishing masterstroke. In one move they have threatened the Green Belt which is so dear to their electorate and they have also failed to address the urgent need for new affordable homes. Somehow they have also managed to waste a huge amount of money and alienate local residents who tried to have their voices heard and were ignored. In their consultation on the borough’s Local Plan, residents have felt shut out and taxpayers’ money has been wasted on a botched attempt to hear only the views the Conservatives want to hear. They set up a ‘propaganda shop’ in the centre of Guildford to which almost nobody came.

What a waste of money!

What a waste of money!

Since the 2010 election, the Conservative-LibDem Coalition government has set about attacking the Green Belt, the countryside and the environment generally. Their councillors on Guildford Borough Council have joined in enthusiastically. Our country needs new homes but housing starts are at an all-time low. The big developers have pressured ministers for relaxations in planning laws which the government has given in to. The Tory Party receives donations from these companies and is happy to let them hoard planning permissions. There are unused planning permissions for 400,000 new homes in England and Wales, including many in Guildford.

Tories and LibDems would build here

Tories and LibDems would build here

Developers would rather build on pristine countryside than brownfield sites. So, rather than stand up for their electorate, Conservatives are standing up for big developers and planning to change Green Belt boundaries in the Borough of Guildford to allow them to concrete over green fields.

On Surrey County Council, drink-drive Cllr John Furey is the Cabinet member for the environment but he is all in favour of tearing up the Green Belt. Like Surrey’s own Mr Toad, he stopped the council from pledging to do everything in its power to protect the Green Belt. As someone who is known for hastily leaving the scene of an accident, will Cllr Furey stick around to witness the devastation he hopes to cause to Surrey’s countryside?

In Guildford, the Conservative Leader of the council, drink-drive Cllr Mansbridge, refused to meet with Green Belt campaigners. Yet he said that Conservatives are the “guardians of the Green Belt”. Nothing could be further from the truth. Since 2010, the Tory-LibDem government has slashed away at Green Belt protection. They have relaxed Major Developed Sites (MDS) rules in the Green Belt and ‘permitted development rules’ for agricultural buildings so that barns can be turned into industrial units and there is nothing that local people or councils can do about it.

Meanwhile, the LibDem group on Guildford Borough Council put out a statement saying, not only would they build on the current Green Belt, they would consider building on Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty too. As usual, we cannot expect any opposition to the Tories from the LibDems, quite the contrary.

Labour set up the Green Belt and are the only main party defending it now. Ed Miliband, in his conference speech, set out how we would compel developers to use the planning permissions they have acquired to build the new houses we need. I will be touring the borough and the constituency to inspect sites where planning permission has been granted and asking why construction of new homes is not taking place. The 1,000 empty homes in the borough should be in the council’s sights, instead they are turning a blind eye.

Personally, as regular readers of this blog know, I have long campaigned to protect the Green Belt in Surrey. I am not an environmentalist despite being an airline pilot, I am an environmentalist because I am an airline pilot. I have visited every corner of the globe and witnessed with my own eyes the effects of allowing unrestricted development of the countryside.

I lived in the USA for over a year and the lack of Green Belt there allows towns and cities to sprawl out into each other. The centres of towns and cities are left derelict because it is cheaper and easier to build on fields outside their boundaries. Countryside is chewed up and wildlife snuffed out. This uncontrolled sprawl has been a disaster for the USA. England is still a green and pleasant land. Losing the Green Belt, even bit-by-bit, would permanently change our country for the worse for future generations.

City centres become derelict when the countryside is totally open for development

City centres become derelict when the countryside is totally open for development

I am a member of the Campaign to Protect Rural England and I believe passionately that the Green Belt should remain in perpetuity. Just take a look at the USA and decide if you want Surrey to look like that.

Our Green Belt should not be sacrificed simply to boost the profits of big development companies. Guildford Tory and LibDem councillors should remember they are only the temporary administrators of the borough’s countryside. The people of the borough have stood up and said with a loud clear voice that they want their Green Belt intact for generations to come. I stand up alongside them and add my voice. Guildford Borough Council – don’t sell out the Green Belt!

Longcross South: A New Surrey Village

The 300-acre ex-DERA site at Chobham Common has been a frequent subject on this blog. The whole site is part of the Green Belt in Surrey straddling the M3 within Runnymede Borough Council area but adjacent to Chobham and Windlesham in Surrey Heath. There are some buildings on the site, particularly on the smaller North Site.

There is already a ‘hybrid’ planning application being processed for the North Site for a large business park and 200 new homes. This does not depend on the site being removed from Green Belt, so it is strange that RBC want to remove the whole site. One possible reason is that the developer actually wants to build more intensively on the North Site than the current application.

The latest news is about the South Site. This is largely undeveloped at the moment. It was used many years ago to test tanks and armoured vehicles on so there is a test track but very few buildings. The developers say they want to build 1,300 homes on the South Site. This would devastate the rare wildlife on Chobham Common which is a Site of Special Scientific Interest, a National Nature Reserve and a Special Protection Area. Also, there is no transport infrastructure to support new homes here. The roads cannot cope already and this development would cause gridlock in Windlesham, Chobham and Sunningdale.

Early next year, RBC’s Local Plan, which includes removing the entire DERA site from Green Belt, will go before the Planning Inspectorate. I will be addressing the Examination in Public on behalf of the Windlesham Society where I am the Planning Officer.

In the meantime, the public consultation for Longcross South is 28-30 Nov. I’ll be going to that to ask why the North Site has to be removed from Green Belt and to object to the impact of the South Site development on local villages. See you all there!

Objection to latest housing plan at Chobham Common

Regular readers will already know about the plans to build 200 houses on the Green Belt ex-DERA site at Chobham Common. This endangers rare wildlife, destroys the beautiful Surrey countryside and would add to the chronic infrastructure problems here like the lack of access to GPs, shortage of school places and congested roads.

I have submitted objections on behalf of the Windlesham Society to both Runnymede Borough Council and Surrey Heath Borough Council. Here is an example: Objection to 2013 DERA application

You can read about the planning application here.

If you object too, you can email

Surrey Heath Borough Council are being consulted about this application and they can be contacted here: Their reference number is 13/0618.


New DERA Site Planning Application

Here is the latest planning application to be filed by Crest Nicholson for the DERA site at Chobham Common after they withdrew their previous one:

Aug 13 DERA

I was going to post links to Runnymede Borough Council’s website for the full list of documents but it has crashed, again. This usually happens when the DERA site is in the news!

We defeated the last application and we can defeat this one too. Our Green Belt is not up for sale, at any price.

We won the last battle but this is a war, between ordinary residents on one side and the power and money of Crest Nicholson, Aviva Investors and drink-drive Cllr John Furey on the other. The result of this war will decide the fate of Surrey’s countryside, its rare wildlife and the peace and quiet of many villages and towns.


The RBC website now has the new plans and documents and it seems to be running normally, at the moment.

Say Yes 2 Europe - Remain in the EU

Grassroots campaign for a decisively pro-EU result in the UK referendum


Labour in Hanover & Elm Grove

A Mad Man With A Blog

Look upwards, and share the wonders I've seen...

Sophia James

Labour Councillor for Katesgrove Ward

Cranleigh Labour Party

A voice for Cranleigh in tough times

Stanwell Voice

News and views from Robert Evans - Labour County Councillor for Stanwell Moor, Stanwell and part of North Ashford

The Camberley Eye

Community news and views about Camberley


Smile! You’re at the best site ever

Red Reflections

Tracey Hill's blog: Labour Councillor for the Hollingdean and Stanmer ward on Brighton and Hove City Council, elected 7th May 2015. All views her own. Tweets more often than blogs.

No More Page 3

Because Boobs Aren't News

Public Libraries News

What's happening to your library?

Pride's Purge

an irreverent look at UK politics

%d bloggers like this: